As
Israel finishes celebrating its 58th birthday, so too the Palestinians
commemorate what they refer to as "al-Nakba" ("the catastrophe") that represents
the creation of the State of Israel in 1948. Articles such as Ghada Karmi's in
the
Guardian on 15 May serve as a reminder of how the Palestinian narrative has
found its way into mainstream discourse over the years, muddying the waters of
history and serving as a means of demonising Israel.
Using emotional language to elicit a sympathetic response, Ghada Karmi omits
key facts and context behind the events that occurred during Israel's War of
Independence and makes a number of disputable claims:
... Israel displaced 250,000 to take their land without compensation.
... Jews fought to seize our land in the wake of the 1947 UN partition
resolution.
In fact, as
Mitchell Bard writes, the Palestinians left their homes in 1947-48 for a
variety of reasons. Thousands of wealthy Arabs left in anticipation of a war,
thousands more responded to Arab leaders' calls to get out of the way of the
advancing armies, a handful were expelled, but most simply fled to avoid being
caught in the cross fire of a battle. Had the Arabs accepted the 1947 UN
resolution, not a single Palestinian would have become a refugee and an
independent Arab state would now exist beside Israel.
Karmi also fails to mention the 820,000
Jewish
refugees from Arab countries, some nearly 600,000 of whom were resettled in
Israel at great expense to the new state and with no offers of compensation.
... Israelis made much of the danger they faced from five Arab armies
in the 1948-49 war, but in reality their forces were greater than all their
opponents' combined, and the latter ill equipped and poorly trained.
Karmi deliberately downplays the existential danger as
Israel faced invasion. As
Bard
writes: When Israel declared its independence in May 1948, the army did
not have a single cannon or tank. Its air force consisted of nine obsolete
planes. Although the Haganah had 60,000 trained fighters, only 18,900 were fully
mobilised, armed and prepared for war. On the eve of the war, chief
of operations Yigael Yadin told David Ben-Gurion: "The best we can tell you is
that we have a 50 - 50 chance."
Growing up in Britain, I got no sympathy but rather kept being told
about the need to give Jews a state they could feel safe in. But at whose
expense was this generosity? We Palestinians had no hand in the Holocaust,
nor in persecuting Jews.
In fact, the Mufti of Jerusalem
Haj
Amin Al-Husseini sought Hitler's aid in extending Nazi anti-Jewish pogroms
to the Middle East and in 1945 Yugoslavia
sought to indict the Mufti as a war criminal for his role in recruiting
20,000 Muslim volunteers for the SS, who participated in the killing of Jews in
Croatia and Hungary. In addition, recent
British
archives have revealed that Nazi Germany attempted to ship arms to
Palestinian forces in the 1930s with the aim of preventing the emergence of a
Jewish state.
In any case, while Karmi attempts to portray the creation of Israel as the
result of the Holocaust, Jewish rights to a national home were enshrined in the
1917
Balfour Declaration and in the terms of the League of Nations, which gave
Britain the Mandate to administer Palestine after World War One, as well as the
ties of the Jewish people to the land going back some 3700 years.
Bringing the situation to the present day, Karmi lays the blame for the
disastrous economic situation of the Palestinians solely on Israel, while
failing to mention the longstanding corruption within the PA and the refusal of
Hamas to renounce violence and recognise Israel. This, a reasonable demand of
donor nations that have for too long failed to properly monitor the PA's
accounts and funneling of money for terror activities at the expense of much
needed infrastructure and social welfare.
Karmi goes on to claim that "Israel's assault on the Palestinians
continues", quoting casualty statistics while failing to acknowledge the number
of those who were directly involved in terrorism or died while confronting IDF
troops.
Referring to international financial sanctions, it is disingenuous of Karmi
to assert that "the world's silence in the face of this cruelty is astonishing",
while at the same time, Israel is releasing tax funds collected for the PA in
order to channel the money directly to the Palestinian people as the US and EU
also seek to send aid while bypassing the Hamas government.
Karmi's article represents a wholly one-sided and distorted representation,
not only of the history of 1947-48 but also of present day events. While
blaming Israel, it also neglects to attribute any form of Palestinian
self-responsibility for their current situation.
While the Guardian has a long history of publishing such articles, the
paper's claim to give a platform to commentators from both sides is undermined
by a 12 May opinion piece on "al-Nakba" by
Karma Nabulsi
only a few days before Ghada Karmi's. HonestReporting UK does not remember any
Israeli commentators appearing in the Guardian on Israel's Independence Day.
Subscribers are urged to keep their eyes open for further
articles of this nature as the Palestinians commemorate "al-Nakba".
Comments to the Guardian:
letters@guardian.co.uk
BBC REPORT STIRS UP CYNICISM IN THE TIMES
Writing in the
Times, Martin Walker, the Editor of United Press International responds to the
astonishing claim of the
independent report into the BBC's Israeli-Palestinian coverage that the BBC
could be said to be biased in favour of Israel:
This produced mocking guffaws in my own newsroom, where some of the
BBC's greatest hits - or perhaps misses - remain fresh in the memory....
These are isolated examples, but they stick longer in the memory
because they are reinforced by a broader pattern of coverage that seems to
play down that Israel is a democracy that elects Israeli Arabs to the
Knesset and which does not engage in systematic terrorism and suicide
bombing of civilians. So it was startling to read the report for the BBC
governors finding so much bias in favour of Israelis.
Read and comment on the whole article
here.
HonestReporting UK
Thank you for your involvement in responding
to media bias.
To support our work, donate here today.